SOMETIMES THEY HAVE VALID POINTS

I heard an interesting comment by an otherwise some what nutty Jesse Ventura. He commented on the fact that the Fed requires/mandates all employees to retire at 65. How can we elect someone, at 72, to be the boss of people he will have to retire at 65? It is an interesting point, and definitely establishes age as a political argument and talking point. He is equally negative on the Dems and their "Get out of the War", but only after I am elected, speeches. His final point I enjoyed, was that he will not pay/fund to get elected, more than he will make in a year at the position. That was probably the neatest thing I have heard in a while. Imagine a politico that was not in debt, and a risk of being swayed because of debt.